Generation We/Ew

Eww if I see another, cringey, video featuring the well lit faces of visionary thinkers against heavenly white backgrounds I am actually going to vom. The nub i’m posting here features the same device used in these videos (different voices completing the same sentence giving a sense of consensus on an issue) to explain ‘generation we’, who, if the nub is to be believed will have the same influence on world politics as the baby boomers did before them. Apparently ‘we’, born between 1978-2000, are better educated, less politically partisan and more technologically adept.

The young faces under turbulent skies vibe seemed like a crude way to fill some of the gaps in the assertions, making me question this video’s nub credentials.  The ending then totally freaked me out leaving me undecided as to whether this is a big idea,  an advert for a book (nubvertising) or a rallying call to a generation to support non-fossil fuel based energy solutions (nubaganda).

Advertisements

a kinetic typo

Kinetic typography is kind of the nub minimum wage – it’ll keep you going but it’s not much to work with. There’s been some decent use of it in the past, mainly because it was just new – but it’s played out now. You knew that once the Tories got on board, the ship of swizz was going down faster than the Exxon Valdez.

I’m bored now of watching the same old, same old typography vids – here’s a speech, here’s a cool font, here’s that speech in a cool font, look how it moves across the screen, you can see the words, in a cool font, look they’re still moving, but now at an angle.

If you’re even going to attempt a speech nub now, you need to be all about the storytelling. Great videos like ‘I Met The Walrus‘ and the Harvey Milk speech (a dedicated post on these is coming) use the narrative as bass note not treble; building their own version of the message on top.

Despite most of this post, there is still hope for kinetic typography beyond the usual blahdey blah. This tiny, tiny nub by FAD (and turd polishers JWT-NY) drugs the text, busts it out of the nub institution and leaves it to wonder around blinking in the sunlight. Nice font too.

Don’t Forget

I read somewhere that our cultural perceptions of memory are often linked to the technology of archiving and communication. When it was pen and paper, memories were talked of as being inscribed into the brain, in a digital age we think of our brains as big stores from which we can extract information, and maybe in a social/cloud computing age we will see our memories as attached to objects and networks and peoples as we move our memories from being individually remembered to being collectively remembered, in the process allowing us to forget less.

But what exactly are memories? Yes, dates and facts and numbers and images, and yes also smells and feelings but also movement and balance and a sense of ourselves in physical space. We think of memory as a function of our brain rather than actually being an integral component of our being, perhaps as a reflection of a wider cultural seperation of mind and body and self. But the process of remembering is part of us, it is an act of construction and of assigning value, that we seem to have little conscious control over. Someone once wrote (I think, Emanuel Litvinoff) that all memory is false, that remembering is the act of imposing a narrative on events that had none.

If remembering is important for us to build and grow then equally important must be the act of forgetting. Forgetting allows us move forward, to reconstruct, to reinvent and re-interpret – what we forget is as much a part of creating narrative as remembering. But I guess it is inevitable that if an essential part of ourselves is our memory, our record of our narrative, then forgetting is also dissolution.

In Billy Collins’ lovely poem ‘Forgetfulness’ forgetting becomes like someone you love going away forever, like parts of you slowly breaking off and slipping away into oblivion. This nub is of the former American Poet Laurete reciting the poem.

What’s most interesting is that unlike a lot of our previous posts, it doesn’t just visualise the ‘idea’, it performs it and therefore reinterprets it. The video heightens the poem’s air of melancholy and regretful inevitability, retelling the story in it’s own way. The written poem and the nub are essentially become two different versions.

I think what can be valuable about a nub is that it can add emotion and feeling to an abstract idea, or heighten and re-interpret the emotions where they already exist. This is where nubs can come into their own, far beyond the first basic steps of kinetic typography. I will post further about this soon, and about poetry nubs too.

This nub was created by the big advertising company JWT (NY). Whilst on a break from using their vast creative talents to “give the impression of solidity to pure wind”, they produced quite a few excellent nubs of Billy Collins’ poems, which you can find on our YouTube channel (eyes right). If you can manage to forget about who made them, they are quite lovely.

godnub

Most Anglican churches fit into one of two groups – the ones where you stand in pews and somberly repeat prayers and sing hymns written at least 80 years ago and the ones where you hold your hands above your head, play guitars and sing words off a screen at the front of the church. This later group completely love the nub. Both youtube and vimeo are awash with videos that are quickly trying to deliver lessons that come from the pulpit. The one I have posted here bears stark similarities to this old favourite about, eh, hem, copyright.